|
| |
Records not up to snuff?
By making a few enhancements, you can significantly reduce the risks
to your practice:
Do a self assessment of your own records:
- Ask a respected colleague to review a
sample of your records.
- Contact the peer review committee of
your state association and request an informal record
review.
- If you use a consultant, ask the company's records expert to
review your records.
Develop a plan:
Does
the problem relate to your forms or how you complete — or
fail to complete — the paperwork? Then:
- Do a critical review of what works and
what doesn't.
- Keep what works. Don't "throw out the
baby with the bathwater."
- Find forms that fit your
practice/technique style.
- Don't reinvent the wheel. Review what is
available commercially or used by colleagues.
- Borrow what works. Don't steal copyrighted works, but ask those
who have solved records problems to share what they use.
Are there significant delays in completing records? If so:
- Is the problem a lack of time or a lack
of discipline?
- Work on revising your schedule — Build
in time each morning and afternoon to "get caught up" on
your records.
- Ask your staff to help you develop the
discipline to complete your records.
- Set a goal to complete all records before leaving each day.
Does every record look identical? Then:
- Study what you write in patient records.
- Create alternate phrases and terms to
describe what you find and see.
- Write down any alternate terms and phrases you use and keep these
close to the area you complete records.
Clinical record keeping is too important to be taken lightly, but
it can be done completely and efficiently — without taking much time
away from patient care.
|
|
- Altered records. Records should be kept
in ink, preferably black, so that clear copies can be made when
necessary. How should doctors correct records if a lawsuit is filed?
They shouldn't — records should never be altered. Malpractice
attorneys often hire expert document examiners to analyze chart
notes when it appears a record may have been changed or a post-entry
note added (including sophisticated analysis of the ink appearing
on the original). There's no faster way to damage your credibility
in court than for a plaintiff's attorney to stand in front of a
judge and jury and prove you lied. Once notified of a legal action
the record should be sealed and no changes made.
- Entries not dated or identified. Chiropractors see some patients for many
years. Be sure to identify the year along with the patient's name
or identifier on each page of the record. When this is not done, errors
can be made during photocopying. It's not unheard of for pages — or even
different patient records — to be merged together.
- Obliterated entries. Mistakes in the record can happen in any office. How
they are corrected is important. Always draw a line through the
incorrect entry, write the correct information and initial and date the
correction. This makes clear what was originally written and what was
added. Never use white-out or scribble over the entry because it fuels
suspicion about what the original entry might have been.
- Entries not signed, or signed or countersigned without
having been read. Never send
out dictated records without having read them. You have no idea what
many have happened during the transcription. Two records may have run
together, an entry may have been left out or irrelevant information
added by the transcriptionist.
- Entries for care performed without signature. Always indicate who provided care
to the patient and include a signature recording the author of the
entry. Even if you are a solo practitioner, it is good practice
management to initial the daily note.
- Illegible records. Doctors are notorious for poor handwriting and the
point of many jokes. The real point is that records must be able to be
read by another provider of same license. A situation may occur when you
might be unavailable to care for your patients. In that case, a
replacement doctor must be able to read and understand your records to
provide proper and necessary care.
- Lots of blank spaces on the page. Busy doctors sometimes need a form that provides
memory prompts so nothing is forgotten. And there are valid clinical
reasons for leaving a space blank. However, if a form is continually 90
percent blank, move frequently used items to another form and eliminate
the unused form.
- Uncommon abbreviations. Abbreviations are a
wonderful tool and can save time in writing daily records. But
if you make up your own, you'll need to send out a legend every
time you send out records. Use standard abbreviations.
- Failure to document patient noncompliance. All doctors have experienced a patient
who is noncompliant and felt the need to discharge them from care. Be
sure to document the episodes of noncompliance, whether it is missed
appointments, frequent cancellations without rescheduling, failure to do
recommended exercises or refusal to stop certain activities (work or
sport related). This documentation can be critical if you are
later accused of abandonment.
- Not documenting phone calls. We have all received
calls from patients who are in some distress and need advice on
what to do. The advice may be a recommendation to lay in a fetal
position with ice on the low back or to seek assistance from an
emergency department. In any event, it is a clinical encounter
with a patient and must be recorded. In an extreme case it could
be the last encounter before a lawsuit is initiated.
- Charting only the abnormal. When doing an examination on a particularly busy day,
a doctor may be tempted to record only those abnormal (or positive
findings) in the record. This can be a dangerous practice. Although
abnormal findings are important to determine a diagnosis, negative or
normal findings are equally important because they can help rule out
serious conditions. For example, the fact that a patient had a negative
(normal) SLR, negative Supported Adams Test, negative Bechterew's Test,
negative Valsalva Test, normal motor strength, normal peripheral
sensation and normal deep tendon reflexes rules out intervertebral disc
injury.
- Test results that do not have a clinical rationale, evidence
of review by the doctor or patient notification. Clinical
records must include: your reason for ordering a test, test results,
a description of how the patient's care was affected and an indication
the patient was notified of the results.
- Insufficient information regarding home
care (such as exercise). Be specific when giving patients
instructions for home care. If patients should use ice, tell them how
much to use, how long to use it and how to apply it. If you provide
exercise instructions, be sure to include details such as the specific
number of repetitions and sets to be performed.
- No date noted for follow-up care. Always note when a patient should return for
follow-up care. If a patient is told to call the office when care is
needed, be sure to indicate that in the records. When no date for
follow-up care is noted in your records, a plaintiff's attorney could
allege this is evidence of abandonment. If the patient is being
discharged, be sure to document this in the records.
- No note regarding informed consent discussion. All patients must be provided with
sufficient information to enable them to make informed decisions about
their care. In my opinion, this does not always require a separate
document be signed. However, the doctor must at minimum record that a
discussion took place and the patient consented to the care.
- Notes written more than 24 hours after care was provided. Daily records must be
contemporaneous — written as close to the time the care was provided as
possible. The more time transpires, the less detail and accuracy are
assured. Ideally, daily notes should be completed before leaving the
office for the day.
- No documentation of care provided to other physicians'
patients. When you provide care for a colleague's patients
during an illness or a vacation, it's still necessary to complete
documentation on the care provided. It doesn't matter if you
see a patient one time or 20 times, documentation is still required. Remember,
it only takes one visit to initiate a malpractice allegation.
- No documentation of patient education provided. Chiropractors
offer many different levels of patient education — everything
from verbal explanations to brochures to videos and DVDs. Documenting
that this information was offered to the patient shows the patient
was educated about his or her condition.
- Failure to perform follow-up examinations. Follow-up
examinations allow you to document your patient's improvement or
need for additional testing, care or referral.
- Different levels of documentation for different financial
categories of patients. Some in our profession use different
levels of record keeping depending on the category of the patient.
For example, patients who were involved in auto accidents may
have detailed dictated records; those with third-party insurance
may have preprinted forms completely filled out; and cash patients
may have an entry that includes the date, symptom and an indication
to return in two weeks. When you provide the same level of chiropractic
care to your patients, you should use the same level of recordkeeping.
| |
Stating
that a patient is "crazy" could be interpreted in a variety
of ways ... |
- Use of subjective, rather than objective, language. Stating
that a patient is "crazy" could be interpreted in a variety
of ways and isn't particular useful to other health care providers
who read the record. Describe as precisely as possible the patient's
condition and the care you rendered. It's perfectly clear when
you state that a patient is uncooperative and belligerent, but
calling them a pain in the neck could be difficult to explain to
a jury.
- Critical remarks about other providers. The
patient record is not the place to critique your colleagues. Stating
that another provider did something wrong could embroil you in
someone else's malpractice lawsuit.
- Egotistical remarks. Don't boast about your
accomplishments in a patient's record. Remember, if you take credit
for the good, you'll have be equally responsible for the bad. Never
guarantee a cure because it can come back to haunt you.
- Making patients sound sicker than they are. Record
your patients' conditions accurately. Don't make them sound sicker — or
healthier — than they are. Some physicians have admitted
to falsifying records to justify treatments or tests with managed
care organizations. This is not a group you want to join. Just
as in court, your records should tell the truth, the whole truth
and nothing but the truth.
| |
Never
guarantee a cure because it can come back to haunt you. |
- Contraindications to certain procedures or therapies
buried in the record. If there an adjusting procedure
or therapy that could have a detrimental effect on a patient,
don't write it on a small post-it note and stick it in the back
of the chart. Place this information where anyone will
immediately see it when opening the patient record.
- Records that don't change over a series of office visits. Due
to the frequency with which chiropractors need to see patients,
especially in acute phases of care, the daily record may be very
similar or even identical over a span of two or three visits. When
the daily notes are virtually identical over a greater number of
visits, it invites closer scrutiny. Records that don't change indicate
a patient is not making progress, and if the patient isn't making
progress, why are they continuing to receive chiropractic care?
- Squeezing information in between two previous notes. On
occasion a doctor may forget to include a daily entry only to find
the omission after one, two or three visits. In this case, don't
try to squeeze several lines of information onto a single line.
Go to the next blank space, write the day's date, and make your
entry indicating the date of service. Yes, it's out of sequence,
but it can be explained.
Proper documentation can improve patient care, make your life easier
and protect you in the event of a malpractice allegation. If you
noticed any areas for improvement in the list above, refer to the
tips at right for guidance.
Stephen Savoie, D.C., F.A.C.O., is a graduate of Palmer College
of Chiropractic and has completed postgraduate programs in sports
chiropractic and chiropractic orthopedics. A fellow of the Academy
of Chiropractic Orthopedists, Dr. Savoie also serves on the Academy's
board. In 2000, he returned to fulltime chiropractic practice in
Clermont, Fla.
References: The 25 Warning Signs of Poor Documentation,
Susan Keane Baker, American Medical News republished in Medicare
Part B Special Newsletter, July 1996. Contributions from Risk
Management and Record Keeping, An online continuing education,
Stephen M. Savoie, D.C., F.A.C.O., Palmer Institute for Professional
Advancement.
This article is not offered as legal advice. Please consult
your attorney regarding legal issues impacting your practice.
|